Many (most) people think that IFA as a community look at the commission and then decide where the funds of a client have to be invested. Not wrong most of us would think this is fair – after all it is in ‘his or her’ self interest that they should act.

However many smart agents do not do this the way the clients think they do!

Yesterday I was speaking to an agent with about Rs. 60 crores in Equity assets – spread between 3 or 4 asset management houses. Even here his assets are split as follows:

A: 40%

B: 35%

C: 20%

D: 05%

He chooses to invest in A and B fund houses almost blindly between 5-6 schemes. In case of fund house C – he likes 2 of their schemes. He has done business between fund house A and B almost equally, however the higher AuM in case of fund house A is because of its better performance! In case of fund house C, he likes a balanced fund with a huge debt bias.

He looks to the fund performance, how well he and his staff are treated by the fund houses (he claims fund house A treats him like dirt – completely believe him!). However as his older SIPs are continuing to be renewed by the customers, his AuM continues to rise. Also the fund managers are good. So there is no great incentive for him to switch loyalties. However he is pushing fund house B more than fund house A!

Recently he convinced a client to invest Rs. 1.08 crore in SIPs (6 months) in fund house B – over fund house A. Why did this happen?

Well he had an altercation with fund house A – I know the full facts – and he has reasons to be aggrieved. One client got treated very, very badly (in fact cheated of one year’s NAV) by fund house A! The client does not understand what happened (only professionals in this field will understand even if I gave the full details!).

If you think fund house A will give me an arm and a leg for full details of ALL these transaction, YOU ARE WRONG. Completely wrong. I spoke to a very, very, senior person in that fund house – and frankly he was gloating about his appraisal and could not care :(.

Somebody said about there being competition in the financial services industry? Try changing a banking account, and you realise one thing – change is tough even if you are a customer!

So the fund scheme selection is not just how much commission the agent gets – it is the following:

1. How well the fund is doing over a long period of time: – it is the agent’s self interest! As the client keeps the money there for a longer period, he gets higher trail commission, so it makes sense.

2. How long the agent is planning to be in business: if he himself is planning to be in the business only for 4-5 years, he could not care about trail commission.

3. How well does the fund house treat him. Most fund houses love the cheques that the distributors bring, and hate distributors who understand the business or ask embarrassing questions!

4. How good is the back office: if the back office is bad too much time of the agent is spent on handling small queries – this makes life difficult for both the customer and the agent.

5. Clients past history of longevity of investments.

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

  1. I was planning to do the AMFI certification and get registered as a distributor (primarily to manage family investments and to keep the trail commission). While I don’t think my situation would be similar to that of any agent, is there any practical advice on what to be careful of in the role of distributor? According to your point 3, I’m wondering what sort of questions might be embarassing to the fund house. Also, independently of this particular agent’s experience, could you please share which fund houses are good with their handling of distributor paperwork, trail commission reimbursement, etc? Thanks!

  2. Hello,
    I am Kenneth parkar and I am a member of some financial communities. I just visited your site ( and trust me you are doing a good job for your site. I read some of the articles of your site and I really found them worth reading. The quality of your content is excellent. It will help you to earn extra value from search engines.
    After seeing this, I would like to do something for your site and that is for FREE!!. I love to write financial articles and I would like to contribute something for your site if you’ll give me the permission. I can give you an original guest post and I assure you that it will be published only in your site.

    Please let me know your thoughts. Waiting for your positive reply. Reach me at:
    Thanks and Regards
    Kenneth parkar

    [Note: I have some financial sites with Good PR, I can also give you back link from there]

  3. Hi Subra,
    I invest in mutual funds online. It’s quite transparent. So I don’t understand how a customer could be cheated by 1 year’s NAV! 1 day is understandable. Some details would be helpful.

  4. Hi Subra,

    Cheated of one year’s NAV ? How’s that done ? and how as an investor one can check against that …. please elaborate.


  5. Hi Subra, I have been following your blog daily for the last 2 years. I thought mutual funds were well regulated and there is no chance of malpractices. Cheating of NAV is shocking. Can you please guide us on how we retail investors can protect ourselves from this ?

  6. no further details on the transactions. Legally what the fund house did was correct, MORALLY it was wrong…client is a 80 year old lady, and still does not know what happened. It may also not affect her life – on a networth in excess of Rs. 2 crores she has lost Rs. 100,000. But what happened was cruel – and partially the clients mistake and A HUGE PART was the mf’s mistake.

  7. Let me make a wild guess. Took the money, bought the units but didnt allot the units as his KYC was not updated. After getting KYC updated after 1 year, allotted the units at a price convenient to MF.

  8. not fair subra…… u have not disclosed the name of the fund which is ok…. at least tell us how it happened…. forewarned is forearmed

  9. Hi Subra

    I too would like to know the details.
    We also would like to be aware of potential pitfalls.
    Since i dont have a 2 crore corpus , 1 00,000 may matter a lot to me


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>