In the year 1800 the average life expectancy in the USA was about 40 years. A kid born in 2014 in the US is likely to live till the age of 82 years. In fact the probability of this kid reaching the age of 100 years is very high.

Obviously retirement planning was not much of a concept even till the 1960s – the Social Security started at 60 and the life expectancy was less than 70. It is only in the 1980s or 1990s that the concept of retirement planning was being taken seriously.

Take the Indian context. Even today the concept of joint family is not completely dead. Balance sheets are not drawn up and there is not much clarity about whose money is being spent on what. Sure, if there are fights suddenly balance sheets are drawn up, but that is more the exception.

Most of the middle class in India who had a government job were secured by an indexed pension. I know of families which are still being run on the pensions – the longevity of a 89 year old father helps! The 64 year old son who does not have a pension continues to live on the parental pension. Remember Indexed pensions are so huge that a family of 2-4 people can live comfortably on a pension of say Rs. 94,000!!

That brings us to the persons who are now in their 30s to 50s who can do something about their pensions. Those who are in their 60s have already exhausted their ability to earn and accumulate. They are the people whose portfolios are full of LIC policies which are likely to get about 5% pa returns, and are likely to lose money in ULIPs. So if you are planning for the retirement of these people you should be looking at the weighted average yield on their portfolios. Assuming that they have about 70% of their assets in poor yielding assets like Life policies, ppf, etc. it is ONLY with the remaining 30% that you can improve the over all yield to combat inflation.

Tough ask, right? No. It just cannot be done. Ask them to take a walk.

They should have started earlier or increase the amount of equity in their portfolios. And this portfolio needs to be very well managed – for a high return and low capital risk. Easier said than done.

As the concept is new, we are all learning.

Also very few IFAs are capable of handling a staggered inflation adjusted steady withdrawal. Which reminds me of a story.

It was in 1962 that NASA knew how to put a man on the moon. However they actually put a man on the moon only in  1968. Why?

Simply because NASA had to perfect the art of bringing him back. Exactly how many IFAs can help you in the accumulation stage – but what they can do for you if you decide to withdraw it regularly is a tricky question.

  1. lets hope we get clarity on taxation issue of NPS in this budget..or else..going for franklin pension plan full strength.. despite the cost…loosing precious years ..
    any suggestions??

  2. sir i am surprised you saying retirement planning is new concept in india.
    already we planned 100 year lifespan into brahmacharya grihastha vanaprastha and sanyasa and each stage there is clear steps what to do what not to do including education job and family

    sad part is nobody knows or teaches or understands them to tell this current generation

  3. Hi Lakshminarasimman,

    There might be good ways in 4 ashrams and maybe no one is teaching them to current generation, however I am yet to find one example from previous (make it previous two) generations who actually followed vanaprastha and samnyasa. There might be individual examples who left home but they were for reasons other than entering into these ashramas.

  4. Subra sir, why do you keep calling ppf a bad investment? Sure, its no equity but it has few benefits in a balanced portfolio. You get the discipline if long term investing and patience, its an E-E-E instrument, think about people in 30% tax bracket. And if one has made the asset allocation in equity, he/she can look at ppf as a debt instrument apart from other debt oriented MF.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>